Waffles eat Bluesky | TechCrunch

Over the past few days, my blusky feed has been filled with mysterious posts about growing Walls.

Seems to have begun in the back and in front Post a tongue-in-cheek Jerry is a form of sanctity by Jerry Chain that has become very recognized on Bluski: “(Blusky user burst into the Wall House) Oh so you hate pancakes ??”

Bluski’s CEO J Grareer It is quoted with approvalAdding, “Very real. We’ll try to fix it. Social media doesn’t have to be this way.” Another user then asked, “You still banned Jesse Singal or“ to whom Graber Just replied“Walls!”

Singal’s presence in Blusky was a flashpoint last year – when Bloozsky made the initial reputation as a shelter in Trans users, Singal was widely criticized Writing on the Trans IssueThe Ay Change. Argue that the application Singal has violated the guidelines of the community of the social network And have received more than 28,000 signatures of Blusky to ban him and he was the most blocked user of bluskee Vice President JD Vans left himThe

In A follow-up postGraber writes, “Harassing modes to ban someone has never worked. And harassing people in general has never changed their minds.” He also pointed to the controversy by posting A Naz-Nuz Wink-Wink Photos of WallsAs there are SingleThe

Users continued to criticize his – when someone compares criticism by threatening to cancel their service with a customer, Graber asked“Are you paying us? Where?” When another one suggested that he should apologize, Graber“You can try a poster strike. I heard that it works.”

It may be alluring to dismiss the whole thing as another example of a leftist conflict, especially since blueski speech has already gone ahead in question Whether the “Clockker” is a slurThe

Or may be, such as Recommended a satirical accountBarely “a week -long gas leaked in Bluusky HQ.”

However, the controversy also underlined the ongoing tension between the company and some of its vocal users. This is a tension that can be seen in suspicious reactions of the company’s updated communities updated last month, and in repeated complaints that Bluiceki was very fast to ban Palestinian and Trans users, while giving lences to large accounts like Singal.

This excitement may be simplified to be reduced to a single reason, but I suspect that most of the part of it makes from different aspects about what makes it especially: If you think it is the primary community of bluskee, especially the marginal users, but blusky executives may feel betrayal This seems to be unwilling to stand in favor of usersThe

A user who has posted the name Katie Titpossi Imagination This blusky leadership is “Having a large social media app they never want” and they advised to spin it so they “can return to the protocol land where they never have to think about the opinion of the Playbeans.”

Indeed, when Graber does not respond to criticism about posts about Walls, He has resisted Bluiceki identification with a particular group or political riskInstead of emphasizing the decentralized protocol that allows users to create their own options at the top.

He also posted in the current debate ”Acceleration”And Wrote“We have architects on the original system. We have created a decentralized network so that you can run your own addition,” then advised the organization “the upcoming health speech project is a bit of an interaction model that leads to this mobility in Bluesky.”

Graber may even think of the conflict even before the bluskey started, and he imagined a decentralized system that allowed users to move elsewhere when the users were dissatisfied with the organization. As he The founder of bluskee is reported to have written in documents“The company is opposed to the future” “