Uber was not blamed for sexual abuse by California jury, which a woman said that the journey of 20 2016 took place, New York Times According to the original claim, it is the first to be “abducted, sexually abused, raped, rape, rape, falsely imprisoned, harassed, harassed, or otherwise. It may be the first case that the cases were united in the United States.
The first woman in the first case known as Jessica Sea said she was 18 -year -old college student while ordering to travel to San Jose’s airport. Within a short time he was an ekar, the driver deviated from his route and climbed on top of him, kissed him and tried to remove his pants, according to his testimony. The victim told the driver “no, no, no” and tried to remove him. He was afraid of his life after suffering from the next stress disorder due to the attack and later dropped out of school.
Under the California law, Uber fails to use adequate security measures, Uber will be responsible for the damaged damage by the woman and there was a “enough reason” in this negligence damage. On the contrary, Uber needs to be responsible, that Uber did not know and could not expect that his driver would take advantage of the situation that he created.
The jury verdict was that when Uber was neglected, the negligence was not enough to harm Jessica C, but the plaintiff’s attorney said the court had allowed the trial to prove the trial that allowed Uber Jessica to blame the damage to the victims and the victims of sexually assaulted. “[It’s a] The sad day for those who are sexually assaulted across the country, “John Taylor of Taylor and Ring said.
Jessica C lawyers complained to Covering Uber to cover the scale of her sexual abuse, while discovering that 558,000+ trips were reported from 2017 to 2024, which was publicly published, which was publicly published. They also said that the company failed to set up systems like compulsory video recording that could secure passengers.
Uber said that the driver of the case of Jessica C was passed the background checks and did not trigger any alarm because of past complaints. The agency has said that despite the numerous security deployment, it cannot guarantee that the driver’s violation will never happen and it was not responsible for the driver’s abuse in any case. Uber’s protection chief Gus Fuldner testified during the trial that passengers used the service at their own risk.
Uber told NWT that its work was “Never done to improve security on our platform. Uber has worked to raise the bar for years, and we will continue it in the years ahead.”