Friday a group of ex -open employees filed a team on Friday The proposed amicus brief In his case against the OpenAI, Elon opposed the Open -Kasturi to be transformed into a non -profitable corporation planned.
Short name twelve OpenAI employees: Steven Adler, Rosemary Campbell, Nil Chowdhury, Jacob Hilton, Daniel Cocottajo, Gregn Cruyzer, Toder Markov, Richard NGO, Girish Sestree, William Sanders, Carol Winnarteat and Jeffrey. It creates the case that if the controlling company’s non -profit company’s business activities are controlled, it “fundamentally violate its mission.”
Many of the former staff have previously spoken out against the practice of the open. Crewer Called in the organization To improve its accountability and transparency, when Daniel Cocottzlo and William Sanders had earlier warned that OpenAI “Reckless” race for dominationThe WineRite Said OpenAI “should not [be trusted] When it promises to do the right thing later. “
OpenAI was established as a non-profit in 2015, but it was transformed into a “capped-profit” in 2019 and is now trying to reconstruct the public benefit corporation once more. When it was transferred to a capped, the Open was retained its non-profit wing, which is currently a controlling part of the corporate arms of the company.
The Openai has been accused of launching a musk case of leaving his non -profit mission, which aims to ensure the benefit of all humanity. The preliminary order was sought to stop the transformation of the open opening. A federal judge denied the request, but allowed the case to go to jury in the spring of 2026.
According to a brief description of the former Open Employees, the current structure of the OpenAI controls a team of a non-profit other auxiliary organization-it is a “important part” of its overall strategy and “critical” for the organization’s mission. Any restructuring that removes the controller of non -profit will not only oppose the promise of the Openai’s mission and the Charter, “will also violate the confidence of other stakeholders who joined the organization and other stakeholders, based on these promises,” briefly emphasized.
“Opina is committed to several core principles for executing [its] Their charter document is a mission, “short writing. The court should be recognized that it is essential to maintain the administration of non -profit to preserve the unique structure of the Openai, which was designed to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits humanity instead of narrow financial interests.”
Artificial general intelligence, or AGI, is widely refers to AI that can complete any human task that can complete.
In a brief, Open is often used by its structure as a recruitment tool – and repeatedly assured the staff that the non -profit control was “critical” in implementing its mission. The brief was detailed the All-Hands meeting in late 2021, while Open CEO Sam Altman complained that the non-profit of non-profit and supervision was “guarantee” with guarantee “guarantee”. “
“It was common to identify the structure of the unique administration of the OpenAI as an important reason among the competitors as OpenAI and Google or Ethnic as an important reason to be considered as an important reason to join the organization as an important reason for the OpenAI’s hiring to recruit the candidates,” the brief description has been read. “The same reason was often used to persuade the employees considering the competitors to stay in the OpenAI, including some of us.”
The brief description warned that Openai should be allowed to convert to profit, it may be “possiblely encouraged” [cut] The angles are centered among the shareholders of “protection and develop strong AI”. “The current certificate of the Openai will have a very few reasons for a profitable opener to adhere to the” Merge and Assistance “clause, which promises that the Open will stop competition with any” price-affiliated, protection-conscious “project that is achieved by the AGI.
Former Opene employees, some of whom were the research and policy leaders of the organization, joined the growing association with opposition to the opposition against the opening change.
Earlier this week, a group of non -profit and labor groups, like California’s teams, requested California Attorney General Rob Banta to prevent the opening in profit. They claimed that the company “failed to protect its charity” and actively “distorting its charity mission to advance safe artificial intelligence.”
Encode, a non-profit organization that co -ked California’s ill-determined SB 1047 AI Protection Act, mentioned similar concerns in an amicus brief description filed in December.
Openi says its conversion will save its non -profit arm and infect it with resources to spend “charity initiatives” in sectors such as healthcare, education and science. In exchange for its control partnership in the Openai Enterprise, non -profit billions of dollars are reported to be spent.
“We are actually getting ready to make the world’s best-equipped non-profit — we’re not converting it,” the organization X -Written in multiple posts Wednesday.
These parts are higher for the OpenAI, which will have to complete its profit transformation to the risk of risk to some capital raised in or after the end of this year or in recent months, in several reports.
We reached OpenAI for comments and if we listen back to this piece will update.